Thank you Ann for sad reminder of Zandi’s predictions. “Wrong” (To quote Mr. Trump at times of great restraint) Zandi was wrong. Yes. Covid may have been a “blow out”. But it sent the country into a downward spiral of impoverishness. The photo/picture of Ms. Harris’s lyin’ eyes and smugness, sitting next to (former?) President Biden—the CNN MarketsNow—piece says it all. They are lyin’ and the so called more “transfers” is worth remembering as fact that Zandi said it.
Well......I hope house prices decline......along with the Property Taxes on said house. My house has doubled in value since 2018 [for no reason, except that it existed] and the Property Taxes have also doubled.....then dropped just a tad. This in a state [Minnesota, of course] that pissed away a 18 Billion Dollar surplus......onto to find itself short.
Why would anybody vote for this again...on the state level or national level. But I do understand what this WSJ guy is saying. Somebody needs to address the 36 trillion dollar debt....it is tied into everything.
And yes......the Dems will cheat again to win. The fear here...is that.....this time they may do J6 correctly this time. Even Liz Cheney will run for the mountains of Wyoming.
I don't know why anyone pays attention to Mark Zandi or any of these guys. Kamala may win but it will be because half the people of this country have been fooled by big tech and the press into thinking she isn't largely a moron. I say largely because in the interview she managed to stop herself from promising to raise taxes on anyone beyond corporations (which will either cause them to leave or pass along the costs to us). I doubt Trump is going to impose anything more than targeted tariffs. Having said all that, neither one of them is going to seriously reduce the deficit let alone the debt with their plans. But I care less about that than I do closing the border and cracking down on crime. Getting us out of the foreign war business would be good as well while there are still any men left alive in Ukraine.
Is this like Liz Cheney endorsing Kamara? Regardless, from my profession in being in Wall St., I can tell most "economists" are nothing but fortune tellers, looking at data instead of stars and tell stories, and next week market moves in the opposite direction, and they are quick to point out new data in between. Just like so many politicians they only have great ways to tell excuse. But always some stories to tell - something the audience wants to hear (and thus just like popular fortune tellers).
Love him or hate him….Trump understands hardball negotiation. The current tariffs are targeted and the Dementia in Chief or his handlers chose not to remove them. The larger threat of tariffs is used as a warning. The same way he complements dictators in front of the camera and then gives them a photo of their home with a smile.
Call him what you want… the competition cannot diagram a sentence, handel a softball interview or stand up to foreign leaders. Hell, Putin is endorsing the Giggler and probably financing her campaign.
Thank you Ann for sad reminder of Zandi’s predictions. “Wrong” (To quote Mr. Trump at times of great restraint) Zandi was wrong. Yes. Covid may have been a “blow out”. But it sent the country into a downward spiral of impoverishness. The photo/picture of Ms. Harris’s lyin’ eyes and smugness, sitting next to (former?) President Biden—the CNN MarketsNow—piece says it all. They are lyin’ and the so called more “transfers” is worth remembering as fact that Zandi said it.
It is neck and neck as to who is the bigger fool — Zandi or Krugman.
Well......I hope house prices decline......along with the Property Taxes on said house. My house has doubled in value since 2018 [for no reason, except that it existed] and the Property Taxes have also doubled.....then dropped just a tad. This in a state [Minnesota, of course] that pissed away a 18 Billion Dollar surplus......onto to find itself short.
Why would anybody vote for this again...on the state level or national level. But I do understand what this WSJ guy is saying. Somebody needs to address the 36 trillion dollar debt....it is tied into everything.
And yes......the Dems will cheat again to win. The fear here...is that.....this time they may do J6 correctly this time. Even Liz Cheney will run for the mountains of Wyoming.
I don't know why anyone pays attention to Mark Zandi or any of these guys. Kamala may win but it will be because half the people of this country have been fooled by big tech and the press into thinking she isn't largely a moron. I say largely because in the interview she managed to stop herself from promising to raise taxes on anyone beyond corporations (which will either cause them to leave or pass along the costs to us). I doubt Trump is going to impose anything more than targeted tariffs. Having said all that, neither one of them is going to seriously reduce the deficit let alone the debt with their plans. But I care less about that than I do closing the border and cracking down on crime. Getting us out of the foreign war business would be good as well while there are still any men left alive in Ukraine.
I wonder how many bridges he's sold these last few years.
His eyes tell the story.
He's a Democrat propagandist, and an idiot. I'm apologize for repeating myself.
Is this like Liz Cheney endorsing Kamara? Regardless, from my profession in being in Wall St., I can tell most "economists" are nothing but fortune tellers, looking at data instead of stars and tell stories, and next week market moves in the opposite direction, and they are quick to point out new data in between. Just like so many politicians they only have great ways to tell excuse. But always some stories to tell - something the audience wants to hear (and thus just like popular fortune tellers).
My hope is this time his ears will hear and obey the voices of reason. Tulsi Gabbard and Vivek to be exact. But your point is well taken.
Love him or hate him….Trump understands hardball negotiation. The current tariffs are targeted and the Dementia in Chief or his handlers chose not to remove them. The larger threat of tariffs is used as a warning. The same way he complements dictators in front of the camera and then gives them a photo of their home with a smile.
Call him what you want… the competition cannot diagram a sentence, handel a softball interview or stand up to foreign leaders. Hell, Putin is endorsing the Giggler and probably financing her campaign.