The GOP is dangling $61 billion for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel--in addition to the $4 billion annual shakedown--in exchange for $7 billion to secure our own nation from invasion and degradation. Their contempt for you has been expressed mathematically. Believe them.
Regarding Senator Lankford's suggestions about race relations, I have been meaning to invite my Italian neighbors for dinner. I really have.
And you know the money for the border will be spent on welcoming illegals. That is the Biden plan. Their idea of alleviating the problem is to process the illegals more efficiently, not stop them. No matter what this law says, that is what they will do.
"process the illegals more efficiently" = catapult them from the Darien Gap directly into U.S. cities after a bit of hate-America training in the NGO/UN camps
Could you explain your comment about your Italian neighbors? I assume you are caucasian? Your Italian neighbors are also caucasian, and therefore, not a different race than you.
I haven't seen the movie but I just read the plot summary. Apparently, the movie features the Sicilian Mafia. Only a tiny fraction of Italians are members of the Mafia.
There is a small African population in Italy. Are your neighbors African?
The movie features an iconic dialogue between Dennis Hopper and Christopher Walken. I'm not sure if my neighbors are Italian in the Lombard sense or the conquered-by-Moors sense.
And not one stinking, dirty, rotten, corrupt, piece of shit rhino has EVER disputed that fake, made up number. It’s really 10.5 million. I’ve read it and heard it and I believe them.
Is this the same as Media unaware that aids is not a heterosexual non-drug addict disease?
Or is this the same as Media unaware that more than 10M illegal immigrants have entered the USA?
Or, is this the same as Media unaware that BLM was not a non-violent peaceful protest group?
Or, perhaps, is the Media a galactic combination of liars and idiots who care nothing about “journalism” and more about another galactic combination of narcissism, greed and retarded ideology….
Well put. But it's more like 50 million illegals - see my book "Adios, America!" which uses realistic figures to estimate the number of illegals. The low range was 30 mil. Minimum number. And that was nearly a decade ago.
It seems that there is no such thing as immigration reform to the open borders crowd without some variation of amnesty included with an expansion of 'legal' immigration thrown in for seasoning. Yet we are constantly being warned against scams, disinformation, etc. What are these proposals but scams and disinformation?
If I agreed to perform a job for a company for $5000 and after I delivered on time and as promised, the company told me that they had decided that $2000 was the right payment, I'd be a fool to work for them again. After getting no strict enforcement after the 1986 amnesty, how many offers of 'reform' have we had since?
Eventually all lickspittle sycophants who wish to please the regime will fall into line. Illegals with enough fentanyl to kill Detroit or driving drunk and running over women and children? Com 'on, you can't make an omelet with breaking a few eggs.
No coincidence, Biden's WH has just cut off Texas exports of natural gas. Yeah, they want to do an impact study as to whether this is a good thing. Like maybe Germany and the rest of Europe should go back to soft coal and lignite. Makes perfect sense, right?
I can't understand how these idiots don't even care about the optics. At this point, they won't even last until the election. They'll all be hung on lamp polls down K Street.
Remember when they talked about how bad Bush's numbers were before the 2006 midterms and the 2008 election? I think it was Rush who called Lindsay Graham, Lindsay Grahamnesty (or VP Lindsay Graham). I said then, it was because he was pushing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" which of course is and always will be amnesty. He was losing Republican support, he never had D support. The only immigration reform we need is to pause legal immigration and explicitly end birthright citizenship. The rest is already enshrined in existing law.
The WSJ is not our friend on a number issues. The answer lies in the first two parts of its name- "Wall Street." Wall Street has sold America out for the last two decades to enrich themselves and their political cronies. A lot of their other bright ideas are putting us on the expressway to ruin, like drug legalization, DEI, ESG, etc. The endless pursuit of paper growth has directly led to us being thirty+ trillion in debt. for the last two decades, we have had borrowed prosperity which is phony prosperity. Government spending is a component of GDP. Take away all that borrowing and our measured growth would be stagnate. And that is why it feels like we live in stagnate dying nation, because we are.
Everything you will ever need to know is in "Adios, America!"
Yes, ktrip - absolutely right. In early 2006 - before the midterms - W's announced his big legislative plan for his 2d term: AMNESTY!
Polls before the election showed that the Iraq War was more popular than Bush's stance on immigration. A huge percentage of Republicans stayed home and Dems won big majorities in the House and Senate. The facts with footnotes are in AA.
I was a big fan then (and well before) and obviously still am today for good reason! My first personal indication that all was not well was when we failed to enact English as the official language in the 90s. I started my professional career working for an R MOC in 1995 right out of law school in his district office. So I was there for the Gingrich years and beyond. I remember at the time being perplexed (I was young and naive!) as to why they couldn't get this done when it SEEMED to have so much bipartisan support. I have learned much since and no small part of my education came from the books and columns of one Ann Coulter- so thank you!
And every time the shit hits the fan and it all comes cascading down, aside from a few sacrificial dupes, nobody from Wall Street is ever accountable because the politicians always put it on the backs of the real taxpayers and not the “carried interest” scammers whose pockets are full of the non-recourse funny money.
Mark Levin reminded us Friday that the Wall St. Journal editorial page is essentially McConnell, and vice versa. (Of course, he doesn't agree with Ann on Trump <wink>)
Nor did he agree with Ann on Trump in 2015 and 2016 -- until Cruz dropped out and Trump became the nominee.
NO ONE who supported Trump in 2015 -- i.e. on the ISSUES - supports him today. These are all Johnny-Come-Latelys, who think Trump must be magic because of his 2016 win. Not magic: Immigration.
Ann speaks the truth (again). Levin was pro-Cruz. Cruz was excellent on immigration except for his odd flip to advocating greatly increased legal immigration. This is par for the course for almost all Republicans, and naturally they went true to form in the Lankford-McConnell sellout of this weekend.
I was a Cruz guy myself but I quickly supported Trump once Cruz was out. I could never vote for Hillary Clinton. Cruz was hated in DC almost as much as Trump at the time but didn't say as many crazy things. The immigration switch was probably done to "soften" his image and so he could say he was pro legal immigration to placate the rubes who believe the Lazarus poem from the Constitution and the Chamber of Commerce types who would sell their souls to reduce labor costs 1%. The swamp people were always pushing "H1B" visas and crap like that so they could import people who would do the jobs for less than Americans, even Americans of the same ethnicity or race as the newcomers. Unfortunately, I think we are stuck with Trump- Nikki Haley may as well be Biden.
Hate to mention Trump, but didn't the Murdochs (who own the WSJ) brag, like the Bushes, that in 2016 they voted for Hitlery? (After all, Shrub Bush said Hitlery was his sister-in-law!) Don't the Murdochs fill their paper with RINO commentators like the dreadful Peggy Noonan when presumably they could have someone like Ann? Isn't the WSJ known far and wide as the War Street Journal for its dedication to sending Americans abroad to fight other peoples' wars (you know, to defend the borders of Ukraine and Is'ril)? Isn't the WSJ, like globalists in general, constantly telling us AI and robots will make workers obsolete, while telling us we need to import millions of foreign workers?
"God forbid you give a crap about Americans, GOP." This is pretty much what is wrong with America, the politicians are looking out for each other, and not the citizenry.
The WSJ used to champion the following as a constitutional amendment: "There shall be open borders." They stopped publishing, but not believing, that nonsense after 19 immigrants murdered 3,000 Americans on 9/11.
The open borders amendment was championed by former WSJ editor Robert Bartley. He pushed the idea that it did not matter if the native stock of Europe was replaced by Arabs and Africans.
I like to think that he is impaled on a spit next to Ted Kennedy.
This is why I'll be depressed for the next 6 years and especially this year. Gov. DeSantis was the only candidate who would have built the wall and deported the illegals. ("migrants")
Take a page from January 6th, open up a nationwide snitch line for people who spot illiterate foreigners loitering in city streets. Round them up, ship them out. Maybe to Gaza.
We are quickly going to move from asking to invite illegals over for dinner, to housing them, to ordering you to quarter them. We have Trump’s Court which will move to the Left with him or a Democrat replacement with this election, all with the approval of the WSJ, the National Review, and every other outlet pretending to be conservative. Bill Buckley is rolling in his grave because he rightly argued that legal should be reduced. Today, we need a five-year minimum moratorium.
The GOP is dangling $61 billion for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel--in addition to the $4 billion annual shakedown--in exchange for $7 billion to secure our own nation from invasion and degradation. Their contempt for you has been expressed mathematically. Believe them.
Regarding Senator Lankford's suggestions about race relations, I have been meaning to invite my Italian neighbors for dinner. I really have.
And you know the money for the border will be spent on welcoming illegals. That is the Biden plan. Their idea of alleviating the problem is to process the illegals more efficiently, not stop them. No matter what this law says, that is what they will do.
"process the illegals more efficiently" = catapult them from the Darien Gap directly into U.S. cities after a bit of hate-America training in the NGO/UN camps
Excellent point. In all likelihood, the $7 billion is an up-yours wrapped in an f-you.
Could you explain your comment about your Italian neighbors? I assume you are caucasian? Your Italian neighbors are also caucasian, and therefore, not a different race than you.
Have you ever seen the movie True Romance? Some say Africa begins at Rome.
Ha! Love that movie and love that scene.
I haven't seen the movie but I just read the plot summary. Apparently, the movie features the Sicilian Mafia. Only a tiny fraction of Italians are members of the Mafia.
There is a small African population in Italy. Are your neighbors African?
The movie features an iconic dialogue between Dennis Hopper and Christopher Walken. I'm not sure if my neighbors are Italian in the Lombard sense or the conquered-by-Moors sense.
The media thinks we only have 11 millions illegals in the USA still.
The idiots have used the same number for 20 years.
And not one stinking, dirty, rotten, corrupt, piece of shit rhino has EVER disputed that fake, made up number. It’s really 10.5 million. I’ve read it and heard it and I believe them.
“Media unaware the WSJ is for open borders”
Is this the same as Media unaware that aids is not a heterosexual non-drug addict disease?
Or is this the same as Media unaware that more than 10M illegal immigrants have entered the USA?
Or, is this the same as Media unaware that BLM was not a non-violent peaceful protest group?
Or, perhaps, is the Media a galactic combination of liars and idiots who care nothing about “journalism” and more about another galactic combination of narcissism, greed and retarded ideology….
Well put. But it's more like 50 million illegals - see my book "Adios, America!" which uses realistic figures to estimate the number of illegals. The low range was 30 mil. Minimum number. And that was nearly a decade ago.
All these clowns should be voted off the island and out of the country. Langford looks like he took some micro- doses of shrooms😎.
It seems that there is no such thing as immigration reform to the open borders crowd without some variation of amnesty included with an expansion of 'legal' immigration thrown in for seasoning. Yet we are constantly being warned against scams, disinformation, etc. What are these proposals but scams and disinformation?
If I agreed to perform a job for a company for $5000 and after I delivered on time and as promised, the company told me that they had decided that $2000 was the right payment, I'd be a fool to work for them again. After getting no strict enforcement after the 1986 amnesty, how many offers of 'reform' have we had since?
Eventually all lickspittle sycophants who wish to please the regime will fall into line. Illegals with enough fentanyl to kill Detroit or driving drunk and running over women and children? Com 'on, you can't make an omelet with breaking a few eggs.
No coincidence, Biden's WH has just cut off Texas exports of natural gas. Yeah, they want to do an impact study as to whether this is a good thing. Like maybe Germany and the rest of Europe should go back to soft coal and lignite. Makes perfect sense, right?
I can't understand how these idiots don't even care about the optics. At this point, they won't even last until the election. They'll all be hung on lamp polls down K Street.
Where they belong.
If only ...
<<At this point, they won't even last until the election. They'll all be hung on lamp polls down K Street.
Where they belong.>>
Remember when they talked about how bad Bush's numbers were before the 2006 midterms and the 2008 election? I think it was Rush who called Lindsay Graham, Lindsay Grahamnesty (or VP Lindsay Graham). I said then, it was because he was pushing "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" which of course is and always will be amnesty. He was losing Republican support, he never had D support. The only immigration reform we need is to pause legal immigration and explicitly end birthright citizenship. The rest is already enshrined in existing law.
The WSJ is not our friend on a number issues. The answer lies in the first two parts of its name- "Wall Street." Wall Street has sold America out for the last two decades to enrich themselves and their political cronies. A lot of their other bright ideas are putting us on the expressway to ruin, like drug legalization, DEI, ESG, etc. The endless pursuit of paper growth has directly led to us being thirty+ trillion in debt. for the last two decades, we have had borrowed prosperity which is phony prosperity. Government spending is a component of GDP. Take away all that borrowing and our measured growth would be stagnate. And that is why it feels like we live in stagnate dying nation, because we are.
Everything you will ever need to know is in "Adios, America!"
Yes, ktrip - absolutely right. In early 2006 - before the midterms - W's announced his big legislative plan for his 2d term: AMNESTY!
Polls before the election showed that the Iraq War was more popular than Bush's stance on immigration. A huge percentage of Republicans stayed home and Dems won big majorities in the House and Senate. The facts with footnotes are in AA.
I was a big fan then (and well before) and obviously still am today for good reason! My first personal indication that all was not well was when we failed to enact English as the official language in the 90s. I started my professional career working for an R MOC in 1995 right out of law school in his district office. So I was there for the Gingrich years and beyond. I remember at the time being perplexed (I was young and naive!) as to why they couldn't get this done when it SEEMED to have so much bipartisan support. I have learned much since and no small part of my education came from the books and columns of one Ann Coulter- so thank you!
And every time the shit hits the fan and it all comes cascading down, aside from a few sacrificial dupes, nobody from Wall Street is ever accountable because the politicians always put it on the backs of the real taxpayers and not the “carried interest” scammers whose pockets are full of the non-recourse funny money.
Another broken Trump promise. He never did away with the carried interest loophole. Gary Cohen assured him it was good for "incentives" and "growth."
Privatize the profits, socialize the costs. Crony capitalism is alive and well.
Mark Levin reminded us Friday that the Wall St. Journal editorial page is essentially McConnell, and vice versa. (Of course, he doesn't agree with Ann on Trump <wink>)
Nor did he agree with Ann on Trump in 2015 and 2016 -- until Cruz dropped out and Trump became the nominee.
NO ONE who supported Trump in 2015 -- i.e. on the ISSUES - supports him today. These are all Johnny-Come-Latelys, who think Trump must be magic because of his 2016 win. Not magic: Immigration.
Ann speaks the truth (again). Levin was pro-Cruz. Cruz was excellent on immigration except for his odd flip to advocating greatly increased legal immigration. This is par for the course for almost all Republicans, and naturally they went true to form in the Lankford-McConnell sellout of this weekend.
I was a Cruz guy myself but I quickly supported Trump once Cruz was out. I could never vote for Hillary Clinton. Cruz was hated in DC almost as much as Trump at the time but didn't say as many crazy things. The immigration switch was probably done to "soften" his image and so he could say he was pro legal immigration to placate the rubes who believe the Lazarus poem from the Constitution and the Chamber of Commerce types who would sell their souls to reduce labor costs 1%. The swamp people were always pushing "H1B" visas and crap like that so they could import people who would do the jobs for less than Americans, even Americans of the same ethnicity or race as the newcomers. Unfortunately, I think we are stuck with Trump- Nikki Haley may as well be Biden.
A lot of good comments; hard disagree with anything here.
Hate to mention Trump, but didn't the Murdochs (who own the WSJ) brag, like the Bushes, that in 2016 they voted for Hitlery? (After all, Shrub Bush said Hitlery was his sister-in-law!) Don't the Murdochs fill their paper with RINO commentators like the dreadful Peggy Noonan when presumably they could have someone like Ann? Isn't the WSJ known far and wide as the War Street Journal for its dedication to sending Americans abroad to fight other peoples' wars (you know, to defend the borders of Ukraine and Is'ril)? Isn't the WSJ, like globalists in general, constantly telling us AI and robots will make workers obsolete, while telling us we need to import millions of foreign workers?
"God forbid you give a crap about Americans, GOP." This is pretty much what is wrong with America, the politicians are looking out for each other, and not the citizenry.
¡Adios, America!.... Gee, where have I heard that before?
Why aren’t immigration patriots noisily demonstrating for 24 hours a day in Amy Coney Barrett’s neighborhood?
The WSJ used to champion the following as a constitutional amendment: "There shall be open borders." They stopped publishing, but not believing, that nonsense after 19 immigrants murdered 3,000 Americans on 9/11.
The power of the media is the power to ignore.
Wow, did not know that, but I'm not at all surprised.
The open borders amendment was championed by former WSJ editor Robert Bartley. He pushed the idea that it did not matter if the native stock of Europe was replaced by Arabs and Africans.
I like to think that he is impaled on a spit next to Ted Kennedy.
Mark Levin uses that line every time he attacks the Wall St. Journal.
A question for one of those 'town hall forums' with the candidates:
What is your plan to evacuate the forty million+/- illegal aliens in USA?
If that question can't be answered then no other questions are worth asking.
This isn't a difficult problem to solve, all we need are honest politicians with just some national pride.
No longer a need to add a 51st or 52nd state anymore, one the size of California as already been added, so to speak.
This is why I'll be depressed for the next 6 years and especially this year. Gov. DeSantis was the only candidate who would have built the wall and deported the illegals. ("migrants")
Take a page from January 6th, open up a nationwide snitch line for people who spot illiterate foreigners loitering in city streets. Round them up, ship them out. Maybe to Gaza.
We are quickly going to move from asking to invite illegals over for dinner, to housing them, to ordering you to quarter them. We have Trump’s Court which will move to the Left with him or a Democrat replacement with this election, all with the approval of the WSJ, the National Review, and every other outlet pretending to be conservative. Bill Buckley is rolling in his grave because he rightly argued that legal should be reduced. Today, we need a five-year minimum moratorium.
The Murdocks kids who run the enterprise, are the biggest Hollywood liberals!