Indeed, it should come as no surprise that along with the ongoing invasion from Mexico comes all aspects of Mexican culture, including the popular tradition of settling election disputes with guns.
Even the movie 'Braveheart' reminded us of the ancient English custom of first overthrowing a given region militarily and then raping the women on their wedding night in order to repopulate the region with Englishmen. Mexico didn't need to overthrow us militarily thanks to the Democrat Party (and too many Republicans) refusing to enforce our Southern Border, so it's so much easier for Mexico (and every other Central and South American country that is accustomed to voting for people like Hugo Chavez) to merely waltz over the nonexistent border and transform America into a more nicely-furnished version of themselves. Why bother yourself to fix your own country when it's so easy to get into a much more plush zip code just by walking? Especially when half of America's elites are cheering you on and thanking you for the 'diversity' you bring.
That's the way "Victimology Poker" (Gad Saad's term) works! Black people are always victims, unless they are conservative, in which case they are actually white supremacists (see, Larry Elder). Hispanics are people of color (and therefore oppressed) if they are on the Left (e.g., AOC), but not if they are Republicans (e.g., Marco Rubio). Asians are "white-adjacent" (too many STEM graduates and perfect test scores), so they are oppressors too, unless they are in conflict with a white conservative, in which case they can claim victim status for the duration of that single encounter. White women are "Karens" unless they are beefing with a conservative of any race, in which case they enjoy street cred as victims of the patriarchy. And white men are always evil, unless they enjoy anal sex with other men or want to put on a dress and pretend to be a woman, in which case they go from being oppressors to being among the most saintly victims of all (outranked only by black and brown members of the Rainbow Coalition).
Thank you for the update on clean crime Ann. If my memory serves me correctly, and on this is does, I recall our current President calling our first black President “clean”. Perhaps a re-define of the terms diversity and inclusion should indeed include white collar kind too. Before dilution is too much of a “thing”. Too much to handle. Thank you for update Ann.
The founding fathers were all pretty great, brought together in that one moment in time by God. James Madison was a hardcore Christian and intellectual force, so he's up there. OTOH, he was short. George Washington was gigantically tall and matches Madison in devotion and intellect, plus he was a great military leader and president.
Indeed, it should come as no surprise that along with the ongoing invasion from Mexico comes all aspects of Mexican culture, including the popular tradition of settling election disputes with guns.
Even the movie 'Braveheart' reminded us of the ancient English custom of first overthrowing a given region militarily and then raping the women on their wedding night in order to repopulate the region with Englishmen. Mexico didn't need to overthrow us militarily thanks to the Democrat Party (and too many Republicans) refusing to enforce our Southern Border, so it's so much easier for Mexico (and every other Central and South American country that is accustomed to voting for people like Hugo Chavez) to merely waltz over the nonexistent border and transform America into a more nicely-furnished version of themselves. Why bother yourself to fix your own country when it's so easy to get into a much more plush zip code just by walking? Especially when half of America's elites are cheering you on and thanking you for the 'diversity' you bring.
That's the way "Victimology Poker" (Gad Saad's term) works! Black people are always victims, unless they are conservative, in which case they are actually white supremacists (see, Larry Elder). Hispanics are people of color (and therefore oppressed) if they are on the Left (e.g., AOC), but not if they are Republicans (e.g., Marco Rubio). Asians are "white-adjacent" (too many STEM graduates and perfect test scores), so they are oppressors too, unless they are in conflict with a white conservative, in which case they can claim victim status for the duration of that single encounter. White women are "Karens" unless they are beefing with a conservative of any race, in which case they enjoy street cred as victims of the patriarchy. And white men are always evil, unless they enjoy anal sex with other men or want to put on a dress and pretend to be a woman, in which case they go from being oppressors to being among the most saintly victims of all (outranked only by black and brown members of the Rainbow Coalition).
George Santos was at Mar a Lago in black tie on New Years Eve, Jan. 2021. Santos had just lost his Nov. 2020 electoral bid. ...https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9107789/Congressional-candidates-pharmacist-fiance-FIRED-afterattending-Mar-Lago-NYE-party.html
👏
Thank you for your reply to a comment. Yes. I did take notice. Thus. The initial reply.
Thank you for the update on clean crime Ann. If my memory serves me correctly, and on this is does, I recall our current President calling our first black President “clean”. Perhaps a re-define of the terms diversity and inclusion should indeed include white collar kind too. Before dilution is too much of a “thing”. Too much to handle. Thank you for update Ann.
the only way Obama could be referred to as clean is to not notice he kept the pig shit and banana peels in his back pockets.
A better question: How long before mentions of George Santos in The NY Times equals those of Emmett Till?
Ha! Good one.
Ronald Reagan! Oh, wait -- no ...
The founding fathers were all pretty great, brought together in that one moment in time by God. James Madison was a hardcore Christian and intellectual force, so he's up there. OTOH, he was short. George Washington was gigantically tall and matches Madison in devotion and intellect, plus he was a great military leader and president.
So I think it has to go to GW.
probably Hancock simply for the boldness of his signature. Ann is at least as fearless, and I think a bit taller.