39 Comments
Jul 10Edited

"After clearing a homeless encampment along the Santa Ana River in 2018, the Orange County clean-up crew had to haul away thousands of pounds of human waste, almost 14,000 hypodermic needles and more than 400 tons of garbage."

Thank God California banned plastic straws, or the clean-up could have been twice as bad. Another great column, but please Ann, we can't call the dingbats "SCOTUS girls," because at least one of them can't define what a girl is. Best stick with something asexual like dingbats, loons, or creatures.

Expand full comment

Californians, reliable Dem voters, deserve all the droppings, filth and slop resulting from their voting.

Expand full comment

That column would be hilarious......but it's true.....so it's sad. Thank you.....again....Ann Coulter.

Expand full comment

Women compete with each other on the bases of compassion and caring but are generally--proudly, even--ignorant of the realities of material scarcity and resource allocation. Any society organized on the feminine virtues of fairness and harm avoidance (to the exclusion of the masculine imperatives of loyalty, authority and sanctity) would soon collapse for lack of male incentive to produce or protect anything. Feces would be everywhere.

Expand full comment

You just described San Fransicko, as Micheal Savage calls that once beautiful city. Any need any degenerate in SF has creates a valid, moral, enforceable claim on the resources—time, money, etc.—of the decent, working people in and around the city. No wonder most of the aforementioned now, or in the near future will, live in Morehead,KY, or Cullman, AL.

Expand full comment

I rather like the idea of punishing the kinds of crimes we hear about today with thumbscrews, knee splitters, the rack, the wheel, drawing and quartering, etc.

Expand full comment

Yes and public hangings or firing squads

Expand full comment

Machiavelli said: a show of force by the Prince—make it short, sharp, to the point and as brutal as it needs to be—will reliably deter behavior the Prince wants to deter. I am in agreement with that. You folks? Ms. Coulter has said, Trump, despite being a blowhard sometimes, is malleable. Maybe, if he wins a second term, and does not plan to run again, he can be persuaded to test the bounds of the Eighth Amendment. Things that make you go hmmm….

Expand full comment

Things that make you go hmmm….

Maybe some of those wacko dims may be on to something.

Expand full comment

Look at these justices in the backdrop of who appointed them. Leave it up to the dems and we'll degrade into a 3rd world swamp with crazy woke at the helm.

Expand full comment

I was arguing with Cole the other day, and one of my many assertions, was that I don't think a few of our newest "Justices" are as intelligent as many believed. And it's not just "the interpretation of laws, The Constitution, or matters of jurisprudence"- I mean that several of them might actually be kinda stupid. ACB is still a 50-50, as to whether she is one of the dumb ones too.

Expand full comment

They are not stupid. Very intelligent people can have very stupid beliefs, probably due more to emotion than intellect. “You cannot reason a person out of a position he did not reason himself into in the first place.” Jonathan Swift

Expand full comment

Fair point.

Expand full comment

But do the justices do anything except sign what the law clerks write? Radical law clerks ( maybe one of them who cannot be found leaked the decision a few years ago?) are responsible for this nonsense.

Expand full comment

Speaking of SCOTUS girls gone wild, Amy Coney Barrett has been a disappointment so far. Recently, she dissented in the case regarding the January 6 riot defendants. She argued that is was just fine for the Biden Department of Lawfare to use the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 against these defendants. Ketanji Brown Jackson, on the other hand, voted with the majority, with apparent concern for the rights of the accused.

It seems there are now three ideological branches of the USSC: 1) the Conservatives; Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, 2) the Liberals; Kagen, Sotomayor, Jackson, and 3) the Establishmentarians; Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett.

Expand full comment

Great column as always, but I can't stop thinking about the poor dog in the photo 😭

Expand full comment

That's Sotomayor.

Sorry I couldn't help myself.

Expand full comment

I’ve always wondered why a conservative activist group doesn’t set up real encampments in these judges neighborhoods. Something like Desantist did to Martha’s Vineyard. Not rhetorical, really why not ?

Expand full comment

Maybe no need. Anti-2nd Amendment Sotomayor's bodyguard just shot a carjacker in her neighborhood. Inclusion and equity!

Expand full comment

Rules for thee not for me !

Expand full comment

They'd just drag you away without a second thought. On questions like that it's all "Who? Whom?" as Comrade Lenin put it.

Here's a federal appeals court judge saying that US citizens attempting to exercise their First Amendment rights who have opinions he doesn't like are engaging in "outrageous misconduct": https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/03/us/unite-the-right-victims-damages-reaj/index.html

<blockquote> “Over two years ago, the jury used its $24 million punitive damages award to send an unmistakable message to the defendants and to the public about the outrageous misconduct that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia,” Diaz wrote in the 3-0 ruling. “While the law compels us to reduce the award, it’s long past time for that message to be delivered.”</blockquote>

Expand full comment

Thank you Ann for the update on homelessness and the Grants Pass story. I had read a story which included personal interviews with some of the “residents” of the Grants Pass and their exchanges with local law enforcement. (Move along orders) Sad. And. Sadly interesting. Thank you for the link to the SC decision.Will definitely read it. (Cruel and unusual punishment to me would be spending time anywhere near Clooney and his property)

Expand full comment

Perhaps too late. Too many migrants in the area now?

https://www.wmagazine.com/culture/george-clooney-lake-como-house-villa-sale-100-million

Expand full comment

Ann, don't go wobbly on Burgum. Once bad on immigration, always bad on immigration.

Expand full comment

The sagacious Ann Coulter on The Mark Simone Show - (7-10-2024

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ULxrtEAZ9DA

Expand full comment

Thanks for the article Ann. Like most Puerto Ricans, Sotomayor hates white people and unleashing mentally deranged homeless bums upon society, is her way of getting back at the "whitie".

Expand full comment

The contemporary political/propaganda manipulation of SCOTUS's public perception is reprehensible.

SCOTUS is the last line of defense between the tyranny of oh so precious democracy and individual liberty.

When a bunch of loons wish to shred the Constitution, do not look to the Executive, Legislative or even the Bar Association for help. SCOTUS is the last best defense of our Constitutional rights and liberties.

Instead of legal excellence, the appointment of justices has been reduced by both parties to the same Affirmative Action/DEI hiring standards as the local Department of Motor Vehicles office.

To tell us that a candidate has a Harvard Law degree today is meaningless unless we also get a peek at their LSAT scores and samples of their actual course work.

(Is defense of the Constitution and Individual Liberty white supremacy or a form of insurrection? I'm not certain if I just committed a number of "thought crimes".)

Expand full comment

Mental illness causes drug use. People suffering from mental illness abuse alcohol and drugs to numb the pain caused by the illness.

Ann states: "Second, homelessness is not just bad luck, like being struck by lightning. It’s the result of a dissolute lifestyle, taking drugs and stubbornly refusing to get a job." This is not true for those suffering from mental illness. Many are incapable of making rational choices. Does Ann believe that rational people make the choice to lie in a pool of their own excrement on a public sidewalk?

This country has abondoned the mentally ill. More treatment facilities are needed In 1955, there were an estimated 559,000 residents in state psychiatric facilities; by 2016, the number of beds in such facilities stood at 35,000.

Read Freddie DeBoer's editorial "The Case for Forcing the Mentally Ill Into Treatment"

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/the-case-for-forcing-the-mentally-ill-into-treatment.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment