14 Comments

There's no baby there. Just too many corn dogs.

Expand full comment

Maybe she was impregnated by E.T.

Expand full comment

It reminds me of that rape scene from “Splice”

Expand full comment

I showed this to my octogenarian mom yesterday and she was appalled.

Expand full comment

I'm glad her face is chopped off, wouldn't want the kid to see this 15 years from now.

Expand full comment

I think now would be a good time for you to discuss the Jeffrey Epstein saga. I heard you talking about it on the radio show, and the information was FANTASTIC. The whole story is shocking. America needs to hear this. It would be a very successful video.

Expand full comment
Jun 28, 2022·edited Jun 28, 2022

I'm convinced that, to a liberal, there is no more important freedom than sexual freedom. He must spend about 95% of his time thinking about his private parts and what to do with them. I believe a liberal would gladly accept a life term in a North Korean prison camp in exchange for the freedom to fuck the lock on his cell.

Expand full comment

Is it me, or does it seem like all the abortion activists who get on TV are Jewish, but all the women who get abortions are black.

Expand full comment

WOW, is that virtue-signaling biotch screwing with karma.

Expand full comment

And also hope that she doesn’t sell the baby’s body parts as organ harvesting

Expand full comment

Let’s hope that she has a litter of future Conservatives all packed in there!

Expand full comment

the pro-life, pro-choice abortion schism is NOT a Constitutional question at it's core. It is, in fact, a

question of whether or not the foetus is life. The "viability" standard is just a way of trying to, pardon the experession, split the baby. To me, denying the foetus is "life" makes no sense...if not "life", what is it? an infection? But even if it is "life", does the mother have a natural right in nature to exercise complete discretion over its survival? is it not true that in many species, mother's can and do choose death for some of their young for the benefit of the family line? In each side denying both realities - the foetus is life on one hand but also, in nature, mothers do naturally choose "not life" for some of their young for the survival benefit of the family group. Until both side accept that both are true and real and natural and therefore convey some natural rights, this debate cannot be settled peacefully.

Expand full comment

Definitely Referring to the Mother! Or birthing person! Yikes!

Expand full comment

Must be one of those ladies who own very large dogs.

Expand full comment