I, too, prefer the written pieces. I don’t like sitting at my desk watching a video. Nothing against Ms. Coulter — she’s a great speaker — but I can skim a written piece, whereas I find myself simply skipping the videos.
SPECTACULAR podcast as usual, Ann! Since the SCOTUS ruling on NYC's gun laws runs counter to the legacy media's narrative, we can hope that it will encourage thoughtful Americans to read the actual ruling itself and not rely on the media's biased filter. If people do take the time to read it, they'll learn that it is not radical at all and is completely in accordance with the Constitution...and they'll also see how accurate your statements on this and other matters are.
For additional historical background on gun laws in America I'd strongly recommend that readers study Ann's excellent and essential column from 2012 "Negroes With Guns" and also read the book by the same name. Thoughtful readers will discover how breathtakingly ignorant so many in the media...and academia... are.
Yo, Coulter. Good to see you on Piers Morgan yesterday. While you're in analogy mode, the rest of us are sputtering out sentence fragments trying to figure out how these Supreme Court rulings are going to affect the midterms.🍎
Too bad SCOTUS didn't abolish licensing requirements. After all, if Second Amendment is individual right as was established by the Supreme Court, then you can't license the right. Now corrupt state governments will simply increase CCW fees to thousands of dollars and mandate the applicants to take 10,000 hours of gun safety classes. In other words, getting a concealed carry license will be virtually impossible as before.
whenever the subject of concealed carry comes up, I always remember something that happened years ago...
it wasn't a huge thing, but it made me realize that you just never know.
I was in a public place with two friends when a fight broke out across the way. I saw both of them pause, assessing the situation, and then after a few moments we kept walking
I thought about that pause for a moment, because it wasn't just curiosity I saw in them. so I looked them up and down, and then I spotted it.
they were both carrying. and when I asked, they confirmed my suspicion.
I already knew that they're both well trained, and if the situation had required it they were prepared to step in and be the "good guy with a gun".
Mental illness doesn't get high priority in pharm research. But the issue of mental illlness would be taken more seriously in a specialized institution than it would in a PCP's exam room, or in a social worker's office. So, I'd say the answer to your question is no.
Don’t like watching videos. I thought I was paying for articles
I, too, prefer the written pieces. I don’t like sitting at my desk watching a video. Nothing against Ms. Coulter — she’s a great speaker — but I can skim a written piece, whereas I find myself simply skipping the videos.
She’s great. I’m just not a video person.
I prefer the videos.
you're getting more written commentary than you got before this.
Maybe you'd like this better:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/
SPECTACULAR podcast as usual, Ann! Since the SCOTUS ruling on NYC's gun laws runs counter to the legacy media's narrative, we can hope that it will encourage thoughtful Americans to read the actual ruling itself and not rely on the media's biased filter. If people do take the time to read it, they'll learn that it is not radical at all and is completely in accordance with the Constitution...and they'll also see how accurate your statements on this and other matters are.
For additional historical background on gun laws in America I'd strongly recommend that readers study Ann's excellent and essential column from 2012 "Negroes With Guns" and also read the book by the same name. Thoughtful readers will discover how breathtakingly ignorant so many in the media...and academia... are.
https://anncoulter.com/2012/04/18/negroes-with-guns/
Yo, Coulter. Good to see you on Piers Morgan yesterday. While you're in analogy mode, the rest of us are sputtering out sentence fragments trying to figure out how these Supreme Court rulings are going to affect the midterms.🍎
Too bad SCOTUS didn't abolish licensing requirements. After all, if Second Amendment is individual right as was established by the Supreme Court, then you can't license the right. Now corrupt state governments will simply increase CCW fees to thousands of dollars and mandate the applicants to take 10,000 hours of gun safety classes. In other words, getting a concealed carry license will be virtually impossible as before.
whenever the subject of concealed carry comes up, I always remember something that happened years ago...
it wasn't a huge thing, but it made me realize that you just never know.
I was in a public place with two friends when a fight broke out across the way. I saw both of them pause, assessing the situation, and then after a few moments we kept walking
I thought about that pause for a moment, because it wasn't just curiosity I saw in them. so I looked them up and down, and then I spotted it.
they were both carrying. and when I asked, they confirmed my suspicion.
I already knew that they're both well trained, and if the situation had required it they were prepared to step in and be the "good guy with a gun".
The GOP really need a football game where the object is to drop the ball at the 50-yard line. I don't even pay attention on election night anymore.
What part of the constitution empowers Congress to make law anywhere outside of federal territories?
Do you think any of the big drug companies had anything to with closing the institutions ?
Mental illness doesn't get high priority in pharm research. But the issue of mental illlness would be taken more seriously in a specialized institution than it would in a PCP's exam room, or in a social worker's office. So, I'd say the answer to your question is no.
who *complained* about VIDEOS of Ann!