Michael Wolff to Epstein: Be anti-Trump for political cover
"It’s a chance to make the story about something other than you..."
From: Michael Wolff <Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM
Subject: [James] Patterson [upcoming book on Epstein]
To: Jeffrey Epstein
A few things to think about: If the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn’t be pursued. In a sense, better that they know what Patterson’s position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience.
That being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal opportunity. It’s a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you decidedly don’t have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is about your willingness to do that.
My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I’d say), and perhaps some social media efforts. Speaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and interests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive effort. …
Epstein was to the deep state what fang fang was to the chicom’s a honeypot. He was a source of blackmail evidence. Couldn’t they find something less tawdry than child molestation to entrap people with? Unfortunately in the post Clinton era there’s nothing else left. They caught the Clintons red handed selling out to the Chicoms & couldn’t make a dent in him. It took a BJ in the Oval Office to attract any attention at all & even that wasn’t enough. Unfortunately sex is the only thing Americans can pay attention to for more than 2 minutes. High treason is just so boring
A large chunk of the American population believe Trump messed with Epstein children because that's what they desperately wish to believe. The real question is: how big a chunk of the population think like that? About half, is my guess.
Nothing can dissuade those who dearly wish to believe the absolute worst about Trump and/or anyone who might interfere with their most beloved corruptions and perversions.